Alberta Today

Directions

Alberta Today Bold & Clean
Alberta’s real stories. Real issues. Unfiltered news, community voices, political accountability, and everything the mainstream won’t say.

This is Alberta Today.

10/23/2026

🚨 ALBERTA TODAY INVESTIGATION

MARKAZ-UL-ISLAM FORT MCMURRAY: WHEN FAITH, MORTGAGES AND MONEY COLLIDE

WHO GAVE ANYONE THE RIGHT TO MAKE PEOPLE FEEL THEY ARE GOING AGAINST ISLAM FOR THEIR FINANCIAL CHOICES?

I am preparing to share a recording of a Friday sermon at Markaz-ul-Islam in Fort McMurray. In the recording, Sheikh Abdurrahman Murad is heard discussing halal mortgages in terms that, as I understand them, suggest that people who do not choose this product are going against Islam.

I want Albertans to hear the recording and judge the words for themselves.

If worshippers are being told that choosing a different mortgage means going against their religion, serious questions must be asked about religious authority, financial choice and the pressure people may feel when making one of the biggest financial decisions of their lives.

🔴 QUESTION 1: IS FRIDAY PRAYER BEING USED TO PRESSURE PEOPLE INTO A FINANCIAL PRODUCT?

Friday prayers are a place of worship, spiritual guidance and community connection.

People come to the mosque seeking religious knowledge. They should be able to make major financial decisions after reviewing the terms, costs and alternatives, not because they fear being condemned for making a different choice.

I ask Markaz-ul-Islam and Sheikh Murad:

* Is it appropriate to suggest that Muslims who choose a different mortgage are going against Islam?

* Are worshippers being given balanced information about the product’s costs, conditions and alternatives?

* Can community members disagree with a financial recommendation without feeling that their religious commitment is being questioned?

* What safeguards ensure that religious guidance is not confused with promoting a particular financial product?

Religious belief deserves respect. So does every person’s right to make an informed financial decision.

🔴 QUESTION 2: WHAT IS SHEIKH MURAD’S ROLE IN THE HALAL MORTGAGE INDUSTRY?

This is not a connection I have invented.

The Canadian Islamic Finance Board identifies Sheikh Abdurrahman Murad as a Shariah advisor. The board is involved in the certification and oversight of Islamic financial products, including Servus Halal’s mortgage offering.

That raises legitimate questions about the relationship between religious guidance in Fort McMurray and the wider Islamic finance system.

* What exactly is Sheikh Murad’s role in the certification and promotion of halal mortgages?

* Does he receive any compensation for advisory, certification or promotional work related to this product?

* If so, who pays him, and how much?

* Are these relationships disclosed clearly to the congregation?

* What policies govern potential conflicts of interest?

These are questions requiring evidence and transparent answers, not assumptions about anyone’s motives.

🔴 QUESTION 3: WHY ISN’T INTEREST-FREE FINANCING ACCESSIBLE ON EQUAL TERMS TO EVERY ALBERTAN?

The Alberta government changed the legislative framework to allow provincially regulated financial institutions to offer alternative mortgage financing.

Servus Credit Union subsequently introduced its halal mortgage through Servus Halal.

The product uses a cost-plus-profit structure. Servus Halal itself acknowledges that the product is not free and that additional transaction and certification costs apply.

So let us ask the question that matters to families struggling with housing affordability:

If public policy is helping make alternative financing possible, how can Alberta ensure that affordable financing opportunities are fair, transparent and accessible to everyone?

Taxpayers deserve clarity about the government’s role, the program’s costs and the public benefits.

No one should have to accept a financial product without understanding its total cost.

🔴 QUESTION 4: WHY CAN’T THE COMMUNITY GET CLEAR ANSWERS ABOUT RECORDING RULES?

I also want Markaz-ul-Islam to explain its rules on recording inside its facilities.

Does it apply equally to speakers, management, visitors and ordinary worshippers?

Privacy protections for children and worshippers are legitimate. But clear rules and consistent enforcement also matter.

When important statements are made from a public-facing religious platform, the community should have a clear process for raising concerns and seeking accountability.

Markaz should explain its policy rather than leave people guessing.

🔴 QUESTION 5: WHO IS ACCOUNTABLE TO THE COMMUNITY?

Markaz-ul-Islam is more than a place where people gather for prayer. It is a registered Canadian charity that plays an important role in Fort McMurray’s Muslim community.

Its influence makes transparency, responsible leadership and public trust especially important.

The community deserves clear answers about:

▪️ Religious messaging concerning financial decisions.

▪️ The roles and compensation, if any, of people involved in financial certification and promotion.

▪️ The disclosure of relevant financial relationships.

▪️ Recording policies and procedures for handling complaints.

▪️ The use of public funds by organisations receiving government support, where applicable.

These are reasonable accountability questions. They do not establish wrongdoing, but they deserve answers.

⚠️ MY MESSAGE TO MARKAZ-UL-ISLAM

A mosque should never have to fear honest questions from its own community.

If the halal mortgage is a good financial product, explain its structure, costs, risks and benefits transparently.

If Sheikh Murad’s sermon is being misunderstood, Markaz should provide the full context and clarify what was meant.

If there are financial relationships, disclose them appropriately.

And if the mosque has rules about recording, publish those rules and apply them consistently.

FAITH SHOULD NOT BE USED TO SHUT DOWN QUESTIONS. FINANCIAL DECISIONS SHOULD NOT BE MADE THROUGH FEAR. AND PUBLIC TRUST SHOULD NEVER BE TAKEN FOR GRANTED.

I will share the recording so people can assess the actual words and form their own opinions.

The questions are clear. The community deserves clear answers.

ALBERTA TODAY — ASKING QUESTIONS THAT DESERVE ANSWERS.

10/23/2026

DANIELLE SMITH: NEITHER HERE NOR THERE! 😂

There is a famous saying:

🐕 “The washerman’s dog belongs neither at home nor at the riverbank.”

In simple English, it describes someone who tries to belong to both sides but ends up belonging to neither!

And that perfectly captures Danielle Smith’s political dilemma. 🤡

She wants to keep the separatists happy while maintaining support from UCP members who want Alberta to remain part of Canada.

She wants to lead a united party while accommodating a separatist movement that challenges Canadian unity.

But what happens when you try to please everyone?

You risk losing the trust of both sides! 😂

🇨🇦 Albertans have spoken in favour of remaining part of Canada. Now Danielle Smith faces a difficult question: Can she unite her party, or will she remain caught between separatists and Canadian unity supporters?

🐕 Neither fully with the separatists nor fully trusted by those defending Canadian unity!

Danielle Smith, Alberta needs leadership with a clear position, not political games designed to keep everyone happy.

Canada is our home. Alberta is part of Canada. And Albertans deserve to know where their premier truly stands! 🇨🇦

10/22/2026

🚨 DANIELLE SMITH GIVES UCP SEPARATISTS A CHOICE!

What’s the future of following UCP Separatist MLA’s

1. Eric Bouchard — Calgary-Lougheed
2. Scott Cyr — Bonnyville-Cold Lake-St. Paul
3. Devin Dreeshen — Innisfail-Sylvan Lake
4. Shane Getson — Lac Ste. Anne-Parkland
5. Nate Horner — Drumheller-Stettler
6. Grant Hunter — Taber-Warner
7. Jennifer Johnson — Lacombe-Ponoka
8. Todd Loewen — Central Peace-Notley
9. Martin Long — West Yellowhead
10. Ric McIver — Calgary-Hays
11. Dale Nally — Morinville-St. Albert
12. Chelsae Petrovic — Livingstone-Macleod
13. Angela Pitt — Airdrie-East
14. Joseph Schow — Cardston-Siksika
15. R.J. Sigurdson — Highwood
16. Justin Wright — Cypress-Medicine Hat
17. Tany Yao — Fort McMurray-Wood Buffalo

Albertans voted overwhelmingly to keep Alberta in Canada. Now Danielle Smith says UCP members who continue actively promoting separation should consider joining another party.
But some separatist activists aren’t backing down.

The big question: Why did separatism become such a major issue inside Alberta’s governing party in the first place?

Albertans deserve leadership focused on healthcare, education, affordability and jobs, not endless political division.
🇨🇦 Alberta is part of Canada!

10/20/2026

🇨🇦 ALBERTA TODAY | 17 UCP MLAs — ALBERTANS HAVE SPOKEN. WILL YOU LISTEN?

ALBERTANS HAVE SPOKEN. NOW IT’S TIME FOR ACCOUNTABILITY.

Jason Stephan, UCP MLA for Red Deer-South, has announced that he will not seek re-election in 2027. He was one of the MLAs who publicly promoted the push for a referendum on Alberta separation.

The October 19 referendum result sent a clear message: approximately 76% of voters supported keeping Alberta in Canada without proceeding toward a future separation referendum.

Now comes an important question:

WILL THE OTHER 17 UCP MLAs NAMED ON THE REPORTED SEPARATIST LIST SHOW POLITICAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND STEP ASIDE?

The reported list named the following MLAs:

1. Eric Bouchard — Calgary-Lougheed
2. Scott Cyr — Bonnyville-Cold Lake-St. Paul
3. Devin Dreeshen — Innisfail-Sylvan Lake
4. Shane Getson — Lac Ste. Anne-Parkland
5. Nate Horner — Drumheller-Stettler
6. Grant Hunter — Taber-Warner
7. Jennifer Johnson — Lacombe-Ponoka
8. Todd Loewen — Central Peace-Notley
9. Martin Long — West Yellowhead
10. Ric McIver — Calgary-Hays
11. Dale Nally — Morinville-St. Albert
12. Chelsae Petrovic — Livingstone-Macleod
13. Angela Pitt — Airdrie-East
14. Joseph Schow — Cardston-Siksika
15. R.J. Sigurdson — Highwood
16. Justin Wright — Cypress-Medicine Hat
17. Tany Yao — Fort McMurray-Wood Buffalo

⚠️ Important: These names appeared on a list published by the Republican Party of Alberta and reported by the media. Being named on that list does not prove that every MLA supports separation. Some have disputed their classification or clarified their positions.

But after Albertans rejected moving toward a separation referendum, voters deserve clear answers from every elected representative.

🇨🇦 Will these MLAs publicly confirm that they respect the result and support Alberta remaining in Canada?

And if they cannot support that position, will they show political accountability by stepping aside rather than asking Albertans for another mandate?

ALBERTA IS PART OF CANADA. ALBERTANS DESERVE TRANSPARENCY, HONESTY AND ACCOUNTABILITY.

10/20/2026

🚨 BIG LOSS FOR DANIELLE SMITH! ALBERTANS CHOOSE CANADA OVER SEPARATISM! 🇨🇦

ALBERTANS HAVE SENT A CLEAR MESSAGE: ALBERTA IS NOT FOR SALE!

The early referendum results are a major setback for Danielle Smith and the separatist wing of the United Conservative Party (UCP).

📊 EARLY RESULTS AS OF 1 A.M. MT:
🇨🇦 Remain in Canada: 1,005,641 votes
🚨 Proceed toward a second referendum on separation: 310,672 votes

That’s approximately 76% voting to remain in Canada, compared with 24% supporting the next step toward a separation referendum.

Danielle Smith added the separation question to a government-initiated referendum, even as Alberta faced serious debates over the province’s future.

Now, these early numbers deliver a powerful political message: Albertans are not rushing to break up Canada.

💥 A MAJOR SETBACK FOR SMITH’S SEPARATIST AGENDA

Albertans deserve a government focused on affordability, healthcare, education, jobs, and the economy—not political battles that risk dividing families and threatening Canada’s unity.

A premier’s job is to serve Albertans, not gamble with the country’s future for political advantage.

🇨🇦 ALBERTA IS PART OF CANADA. AND ALBERTANS HAVE MADE THEIR VOICES HEARD.

The final official results still matter, but the early numbers are a serious warning to Danielle Smith and the UCP: Canadians and Albertans expect leadership, not division.

DANIELLE SMITH: WILL YOU LISTEN TO ALBERTANS, OR KEEP PUSHING DIVISION?

🇨🇦 ALBERTA TRAGEDY: FOUR CANADIAN SOLDIERS KILLED IN DEVASTATING MILITARY BASE FIRE🕯️ Four soldiers are dead, and dozens...
10/19/2026

🇨🇦 ALBERTA TRAGEDY: FOUR CANADIAN SOLDIERS KILLED IN DEVASTATING MILITARY BASE FIRE

🕯️ Four soldiers are dead, and dozens more have been injured after a fast-moving grass fire swept through Canadian Forces Base Wainwright in Alberta.

The fire broke out on Saturday afternoon, October 17, during high-intensity combat training. Winds reaching 96 km/h reportedly helped the flames spread at an extraordinary speed.

According to Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, 39 people were hospitalized, including at least 19 in critical condition.

The fallen soldiers have been identified as:

🕊️ Sgt. Morgan Wong — Loyal Edmonton Regiment

🕊️ Pte. Shaun Farrell — 3rd Battalion, Princess Patricia’s Canadian Light Infantry

🕊️ Pte. Aidan Goulding — 3rd Battalion, Princess Patricia’s Canadian Light Infantry

🕊️ Pte. Hayden Lykkemark — 3rd Battalion, Princess Patricia’s Canadian Light Infantry

Military officials said they believed the fire was contained before a sudden change in wind direction sent the flames racing toward the soldiers.

Maj. Gen. Wade Rutland described an extraordinary spread of the fire, saying it travelled approximately one kilometre in just 36 seconds.

The cause of the fire remains under investigation.

Prime Minister Mark Carney called the incident one of the worst peacetime tragedies for Canada’s armed forces and requested a detailed account of what happened. Federal flags were ordered to fly at half-mast in honour of the fallen.

🕯️ FOUR SOLDIERS. FOUR FAMILIES IN MOURNING. A NATION GRIEVING.

Our thoughts are with the families, friends, fellow soldiers and everyone affected by this devastating tragedy.

🇨🇦 May the fallen soldiers rest in peace. We honour their service and sacrifice.

10/18/2026

🇨🇦 DANIELLE SMITH’S REFERENDUM: WHAT HAPPENS TO ALBERTA AFTER OCTOBER 19?

Alberta faces a major political decision on Monday, but the controversy surrounding separatism may not end with the vote.

Separatist leaders say they intend to continue their campaign regardless of the outcome.

Meanwhile, Danielle Smith says she supports Alberta remaining in Canada, even though her government called the referendum amid pressure from separatist activists.

The questions Albertans deserve answers to:

🔹 Why was a referendum called when the premier says she opposes separation?

🔹 How much has the process cost taxpayers?

🔹 What happens if the vote deepens divisions rather than resolving them?

🔹 Will the UCP clearly define its position on Alberta’s future within Canada?

Alberta’s future deserves clarity, accountability and honest answers.

10/17/2026

🔴 DIVISIONS WITHIN THE UCP: CAN DANIELLE SMITH KEEP HER PARTY UNITED?

🇨🇦 A PARTY DIVIDED OVER ALBERTA’S FUTURE

A debate is growing inside Alberta’s United Conservative Party over its relationship with the separatist movement.

On October 15, Alberta political commentator Dave Cournoyer reported that UCP President Rob Smith pushed back against calls to remove separatists from the party if Albertans vote to remain in Canada.

Former Alberta Premier Jason Kenney has argued that politicians whose main goal is Alberta’s separation should form their own separatist party rather than remain in a party committed to Canadian unity.

This raises important questions about the UCP’s direction and leadership.

🔴 Can a party remain united when its members disagree over Alberta’s future in Canada?

🔴 Where does Danielle Smith stand on the future of separatists within her party?

🔴 If Albertans choose to remain in Canada, will the UCP respect that decision and clarify its position on separatism?

Albertans deserve clear answers about the future of their province and the direction of the party governing them.

🇨🇦 Alberta’s future deserves an honest debate.

10/17/2026

🇨🇦 DANIELLE SMITH: WHY RISK CANADA’S FUTURE OVER A SEPARATION REFERENDUM ?

Alberta faces a crucial political decision on October 19.

Premier Danielle Smith says she supports Alberta remaining part of Canada. However, her government is moving ahead with a referendum that could initiate the legal process toward a future binding vote on separation.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Mark Carney is warning Albertans about the uncertainty and risks that separation could bring.

Albertans deserve answers about the cost, the consequences and the government’s priorities.

🏥 What about health care?
🏫 What about overcrowded schools?
🏠 What about housing affordability?
💰 What about the cost of living?

These questions deserve serious attention alongside the referendum debate.

Alberta’s future matters. Canada’s unity matters. And taxpayers deserve transparency about the decisions being made in their name.

DANIELLE SMITH: WHY RISK CANADA’S FUTURE OVER A SEPARATION REFERENDUM?Danielle Smith’s Separation Referendum Faces Growi...
10/16/2026

DANIELLE SMITH: WHY RISK CANADA’S FUTURE OVER A SEPARATION REFERENDUM?

Danielle Smith’s Separation Referendum Faces Growing Criticism

The question is controversial because it could start a process with major economic, political and constitutional consequences.

Premier Danielle Smith says she supports Alberta remaining in Canada, but critics question why her government is advancing a referendum that could move the province toward separation.

Address

Fort McMurray, AB

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Alberta Today posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share