08/31/2026
published a piece on the Everlane and Shein acquisition, the shift from climate action to “climate risk” language, and what this reveals about how fashion handles trade-offs.
It explores the tensions between business survival and climate responsibility, worker safety and carbon targets, and the need for proof alongside the growing burden of compliance.
From outside the industry, these contradictions can quickly become a gotcha. Inside, they are often softened through safer language. Either way, the consequences tend to move down the supply chain and land on the people with the least power.
The piece is worth reading because it stays with these difficult questions and looks closely at who is being asked to carry the trade-offs.
If we want better fashion systems, we need to be more honest about the contradictions within them.
Read the full piece via .
đź“·