05/07/2026
Regarding The Met Gala 2026:
I understand the desire to boycott this year’s Met Gala. When Jeff Bezos becomes part of the public face and financial machinery of fashion’s most visible night, people are right to ask what kind of power fashion is celebrating, whose labor made that spectacle possible, and who gets left outside the velvet rope.
I also understand why people still showed up.
Fashion is art. Costume is art. The Met Costume Institute matters. The preservation, study, and presentation of fashion history matters. The work of designers, patternmakers, cutters, stitchers, beaders, stylists, dressers, archivists, tailors, assistants, cleaners, guards, handlers, and museum staff matters. Those people are not disposable because the money at the top is complicated.
So no, I do not think this is as simple as “attending is wrong” or “boycotting is performative.” Both responses can be morally coherent.
The boycott is important because labor matters. Billionaire patronage should never be allowed to launder exploitation or turn workers into invisible scaffolding for glamour.
The attendance is important because fashion still deserves to be defended as culture, craft, scholarship, fantasy, and labor-intensive art.
That is why I appreciated the mayor skipping the gala while using the moment to praise the workers behind fashion. That is the actual needle to thread. Critique the power structure without dismissing the art form. Challenge the money without erasing the makers.
Fashion has always lived inside contradiction. Beauty and brutality. fantasy and labor. wealth and hunger. handwork and spectacle.
The real conversation is not whether fashion matters.
It does.
The question is whether the people who make fashion matter too.
And they do.