07/15/2026
I'm having a blast today, reviewing all my proportions for one of the pairs of breeches that are going to be included in TMM4.
I have gone into illustrator and scaled up one of Freyle's original layouts to look at the proportions which were drawn and compare them to what is written in the diagram.
In this one I have found that the proportions for the length of the breeches are not what he has drawn.
"The fabric is cut and turned to avoid sheen and to preserve the direction of the work if it is rash cloth or damask -- one half is laid over the other matching the designs in the middle. On the left, the breeches are laid out followed by the jacket and its sleeves, as the diagram shows. The breeches are 5/6 of a vara in length and one third at the crotch depth. The jacket is 7/8 of a vara long and the sleeves are 3/4. The collars are laid out by the hem of the back. The whole layout is worked with the nap going one direction."
Following what he has written for the size of the piece of fabric, I have made a rectangle that matches the dimensions he states which is 8 varas of fabric that is 2/3 of a vara wide. This layout is shown doubled with the layers cut and laid out so that if there is a pattern, it is matched. It is 132 inches by 22 inches. He specifies that this layout can be used for fine wool (lanilla), silk, or damask.
Once I have the rectangle, I pull the screen shot into Illustrator and blow it up to match the dimensions. I COULD, but generally do not correct for much parallax in when I'm doing a quick analysis.
What I found interesting about the layout is that the breeches are not quite the dimensions that are stated. The diagram says that they are 5/6 in length both in the written description and the image, but when measured at scale, they are 3/4. The width of the waist is the opposite, it shows 3/4 but the measurement is actually closer to 5/6 but not quite so big. The waist widths are somewhere in the middle.
My goal was to focus on the breeches here, but I figured that I cannot analyze only part of the layout and think that I have all the information. So I drew up the jacket as well and found the they have drawn the back pattern piece slightly longer than would match the front. that leaves a decent amount of fabric unused at the right-hand edge of the image. BUT, if I make the breeches match the stated dimensions and add the missing length, they take up that exact amount of fabric and suddenly the whole layout is perfect in length.
Regarding the width at the waist of the breeches, if I remove two seam allowance widths on each pattern piece, the waist proportion suddenly falls into place. Freyle has had the woodcutter draw the layout with the seam allowances included. Presumably, the extra thick black outline is the seam allowance. At the very least, the garments make more sense if one interprets them that way. I would not assume that all the manuals function in the same way .Freyle's woodcuts are not nearly so tidy and accurate as those in Alcega's manual nor those in Burguen's.
It is not stated anywhere in the written portion or with proportion symbols but the back half of the breeches is actually shown with a longer crotch seam than the front. Something that is common in surviving garments but is often omitted from measurement proportions in the diagrams. In this case, he has SHOWN two different crotch depths for front and back, while only mentioning one proportion in the written.